year 21, Issue 82 (5-2022)                   J. Med. Plants 2022, 21(82): 1-12 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bakhtiar Z, Hasandokht M R, Naghavi M R, Mirjalili M H. Study of variability in agro-morphological traits, proximate composition, and phenolic compounds of some Trigonella L. species in Iran. J. Med. Plants. 2022; 21 (82) :1-12
URL: http://jmp.ir/article-1-3316-en.html
1- Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran , mrhassan@ut.ac.ir
3- Division of Biotechnology, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
4- Department of Agriculture, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983969411, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (174 Views)
Background: Trigonella L. is a well-known worldwide growing genus of the Fabaceae family. In addition to food, the plants have various medicinal properties, including reducing fat and blood sugar, antibacterial, anti-ulcer, and analgesic. Objective: Variability in agro-morphological traits, phenolic compounds, and proximate composition of the aerial parts of some Iranian Trigonella and its relative e.g. Medicago L. species was studied to introduce the superior species for further use in breeding and exploitation programs. Methods: The seed samples of T. astroides, T. elliptica, T. filipes, T. foenum-graecum, T. spruneriana, M. crassipes (syn: T. crassipes), M. monantha (syn: T. monantha), M. monspeliaca (syn: T. monspeliaca), M. orthoceras (syn: T. orthoceras), and M. phrygia (syn: T. aurantiaca) were collected from different regions of Iran, and then were cultivated at the same agronomic conditions. Morphological traits were measured by a ruler, digital caliper and scales. Proximate composition (moisture, ash, fibre, protein, fat, and carbohydrates) and phenolic acids of the aerial parts were determined by the AOAC method and HPLC, respectively. Results: Significant morphological differences among the studied species were observed. The highest protein content was measured in M. orthoceras (13.4 ± 0.4 %), followed by T. filipes (11.5 ± 0.8 %), and T. spruneriana (11.1 ± 0.4 %). Fibre content was ranged from 0.7 ± 0.04 % to 4.9 ± 0.4 %. In the extracts of the studied species, catechin, chlorogenic acid, and p-coumaric acid were found in abundance (0.01 ± 0.05 - 69.32 ± 0.7 mg/g DW). Conclusion: Trigonella filipes and T. spruneriana could be selected as suitable species for further exploitation in food and pharmaceutical industries.
Full-Text [PDF 719 kb]   (116 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Medicinal Plants
Received: 2022/04/8 | Accepted: 2022/05/24 | Published: 2022/06/2

References
1. Millar KA, Gallagher E, Burke R, McCarthy S and Barry-Ryan C. Proximate composition and anti-nutritional factors of fava-bean (Vicia faba), green-pea and yellow-pea (Pisum sativum) flour. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2019; 82: 103233. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103233]
2. Zhang Y, Cai P, Cheng G and Zhang Y. A brief review of phenolic compounds identified from plants: Their extraction, analysis, and biological activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2022; 17: 1934578X211069721. [DOI:10.1177/1934578X211069721]
3. Teodoro GR, Ellepola K, Seneviratne CJ and Koga-Ito CY. Potential use of phenolic acids as anti-candida agents: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2015; 6: 1420. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01420]
4. Dresler S Szymczak G and Wójcik M. Comparison of some secondary metabolite content in the seventeen species of the Boraginaceae family. Pharm. Biol. 2017; 55: 691-695. [DOI:10.1080/13880209.2016.1265986]
5. Tsimogiannis D and Oreopoulou V. Classification of phenolic compounds in plants. In Polyphenols in plants. Academic Press. 2019; 263-284. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813768-0.00026-8. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-813768-0.00026-8]
6. Deshpande Usha S and Deshpande SS. "Legumes." Foods of plant origin. Springer, Boston, MA, 1991; 137-300. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-2039-9_3]
7. Petropoulos GA. Fenugreek, The genus Trigonella, First ed. Taylor & Francis. London and New York. 2002. [DOI:10.1201/9780203217474]
8. Wijekoon C Acharya SN Siow YL Sura S Thandapilly S and Sabra A. Canadian sainfoin and fenugreek as forage and functional foods. Crop Sci. 2021; 61: 1-20. [DOI:10.1002/csc2.20280]
9. Chaudhary S Chaudhary PS Chikara SK Sharma MC and Iriti M. Review on fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and its important secondary metabolite diosgenin. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca. 2018; 46: 22-31. [DOI:10.15835/nbha46110996]
10. Singh A Singh S and Sharma R. Nutritional potentials and nutrient profile of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2020; 9: 3606-3615. [DOI:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.417]
11. Khadivi-Khub A, Karimi E and Hadian J. Population genetic structure and trait associations in forest savory using molecular, morphological and phytochemical markers. Gene. 2014; 546: 297-308. [DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.062]
12. Al-Maamari IT, Khan MM, Al-Sadi AM, Iqbal Q and Al-Saady N. Morphological characterization and genetic diversity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) accessions in Oman. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2020; 26: 375-383.
13. Hasani Jifroudi H and Mohebodini M. Evaluation of genetic diversity and classification of some Iranian indigenous fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) populations using multivariate statistical methods. Journal of Vegetables Sciences. 2016; 2: 21-35.
14. Pasricha V and Gupta RK. Nutraceutical potential of Methi (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and Kasuri methi (Trigonella corniculata L.). J. pharmacogn. phytochem. 2014; 3: 47-57.
15. Moradi P Hassandokht MR and Kashi AK. Genetic diversity in some characteristics of Iranian fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graceum L.). Journal of Crop Ecophysiol. 2011; 4: 55-70.
16. Riasat M, Pakniyat H, Heidari B and Jafari AA. Variations in phytophenol compounds in association with morphological traits in Trigonella spp. Accessions. Annu. res. rev. 2018; 25: 1-16. [DOI:10.9734/ARRB/2018/39533]
17. Riasat M, Heidari B, Pakniyat H and Jafari AA. Assessment of variability in secondary metabolites and expected response to genotype selection in fenugreek (Trigonella spp.). Ind.Crops Prod. 2018; 123: 221-231. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.068]
18. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC (18th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. 2000.
19. Hadian J, Nejad Ebrahimi S, Salehi P. Variability of morphological and phytochemical characteristics among Satureja hortensis L. accessions of Iran. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010; 32: 62-69. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.03.006]
20. Karamian R and Hajmoradi Z. Comparative study on the morphology, palynology and essential oil composition of three Trigonella L. species (Fabaceae) from Iran. Nova. Biol. Rep. 2016; 3: 134-144. [DOI:10.21859/acadpub.nbr.3.2.136]
21. Riasat M and Nasirzadeh AR. Evaluation of 2 perennial Trigonella (T. elliptica and T. tehranica) for forage quality improvement. IJRFPBGR. 2007; 14: 230-240.
22. Montgomery J. The potential of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) as a forage for dairy herds in central Alberta. 2009.
23. Chughtai MFJ, Pasha I, Shabbir MA, Haider MA, Afzal B, Ahmad S, and Manzoor MS. Biochemical evaluation of Trigonella foenum graecum (Fenugreek) with special reference to phenolic acids. Biological Sciences-PJSIR. 2017; 60: 154-161. [DOI:10.52763/PJSIR.BIOL.SCI.60.3.2017.154.161]
24. Ferreira PS, Victorelli FD, Fonseca-Santos B and Chorilli M. A review of analytical methods for p-coumaric acid in plant-based products, beverages, and biological matrices. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019; 49: 21-31. [DOI:10.1080/10408347.2018.1459173]
25. Khole S Chatterjee S Variyar P Sharma A Devasagayam TPA and Ghaskadbi S. Bioactive constituents of germinated fenugreek seeds with strong antioxidant potential. J. Funct. Foods. 2014; 6: 270-279. [DOI:10.1016/j.jff.2013.10.016]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Medicinal Plants

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb