year 20, Issue 80 (12-2021)                   J. Med. Plants 2021, 20(80): 83-101 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Malekpour-Irdemousa M, Mirjalili M H, Rahimi S, Sonboli A, Nejad Ebrahimi S, Hadian J. Agro-morphological and phytochemical diversity and silica content variability among Iranian populations of common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). J. Med. Plants 2021; 20 (80) :83-101
1- Department of Agriculture, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983969411, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Agriculture, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983969411, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Biology, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983969411, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Phytochemistry, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, 1983969411, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1861 Views)
Background: Common horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.), is widely used in the bone and nail strengthen herbal products due to the presence of minerals, especially silica. Objective: Agro-morphological and phytochemical diversity, and the silica content of the E. arvense populations (EAPs) collected from Iran along with two commercial samples from Russia and Switzerland were investigated. Methods: Morphological traits were measured using ruler, digital caliper, naked eye, and digital balance. Phytochemical characteristics were assessed by spectrophotometer and HPLC-PDA analyses. Silica content was measured by Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) analysis. Results: The maximum height was observed in Sarab (EAP4), while the highest width and stem dry weight was found in Marzanabad (EAP11). The highest TPC and TFC were measured in the Russian and EAP11 samples, respectively. Isoquercitrin content was varied from 0.03 (Russian) to 3.05 mg/g DW (EAP11) based on HPLC analysis while silica content was different among samples from 30 to 87.5 mg/g DW in EAP9 and EAP1, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, EAP11 and EAP4 were superior in terms of important morphological traits. Marzanabad (EAP11) was a superior population in phytochemical characteristics which can be strongly recommended for further exploitation in conservation, domestication, and mass production programs. In the case of silica content, the EAP1 was characterized as the superior population which can be interesting for further exploitation in the production of bone, hair, and nail strengthening herbal products.
Full-Text [PDF 1616 kb]   (1059 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Medicinal Plants
Received: 2021/10/16 | Accepted: 2021/11/30 | Published: 2021/12/1

1. Chen S-L, Yu H, Luo H-M, Wu Q, Li C-F and Steinmetz A. Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: problems, progress, and prospects. Chinese Medicine 2016; 11(1): 1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s13020-016-0108-7]
2. Rajpurohit D and Jhang T. In situ and ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge. In: Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security. Vol: Springer; 2015, 137-162. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-0060-7_8]
3. Sofowora A, Ogunbodede E and Onayade A. The role and place of medicinal plants in the strategies for disease prevention. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines 2013; 10(5): 210-229. [DOI:10.4314/ajtcam.v10i5.2]
4. Kumar P. The Economics of Medicinal Plants: Are High Commercial Values Enough to Ensure Biodiversity Conservation? A perspective. IUCN. 2006: 9.
5. Ghorbani S, Esmaeili H, Ebrahimi SN, Palazon J, Sonboli A and Mirjalili MH. Genetic structure, molecular and phytochemical analysis in Iranian populations of Ruscus hyrcanus (Asparagaceae). Industrial Crops and Products 2020; 154: 112716. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112716]
6. Selseleh M, Hadian J, Ebrahimi SN, Sonboli A, Georgiev MI and Mirjalili MH. Metabolic diversity and genetic association between wild populations of Verbascum songaricum (Scrophulariaceae). Industrial Crops and Products 2019; 137: 112-125. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.069]
7. Hadian J, Hossein Mirjalili M, Reza Kanani M, Salehnia A and Ganjipoor P. Phytochemical and morphological characterization of Satureja khuzistanica Jamzad populations from Iran. Chemistry & Biodiversity 2011; 8(5): 902-915. [DOI:10.1002/cbdv.201000249]
8. Mozaffarian V. A dictionary of Iranian plant names, Farhang Moaser. in Tehran: Iran. Farhang Moaser Publishing. 2009, 542-544.
9. Kalbadi A. Flora of Iran, No. 61: Equisetaceae. Forests and Rangelands Research Institute; 2009.
10. Sandhu NS, Kaur S and Chopra D. Equisetum arvense: pharmacology and phytochemistry-a review. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Res. 2010; 3(3): 146-150.
11. Mimica-Dukic N, Simin N, Cvejic J, Jovin E, Orcic D and Bozin B. Phenolic compounds in field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) as natural antioxidants. Molecules 2008; 13(7): 1455-1464. [DOI:10.3390/molecules13071455]
12. Uslu M, Mele A and Bayraktar O. Evaluation of the hemostatic activity of Equisetum arvense extract: The role of varying phenolic composition and antioxidant activity due to different extraction conditions. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2019; 9: 4157-4163. [DOI:10.33263/BRIAC94.157163]
13. Badole S and Kotwal S. Evaluation of proximate, free radical scavenging activity, and phytochemical analysis of Equisetum arvense L. extracts. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources (IJNPR)[Formerly Natural Product Radiance (NPR)]. 2017; 8(2): 146-150.
14. Bayati M, Tavakoli MM, Ebrahimi SN, Aliahmadi A and Rezadoost H. Optimization of effective parameters in cold pasteurization of pomegranate juice by response surface methodology and evaluation of physicochemical characteristics. LWT. 2021; 147: 111679. [DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111679]
15. Kamtekar S, Keer V and Patil V. Estimation of phenolic content, flavonoid content, antioxidant and alpha amylase inhibitory activity of marketed polyherbal formulation. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 2014; 4(9): 61.
16. Andi SA and Maskani F. Essential oil chemical diversity of twenty Iranian Origanum vulgare L. subsp. viride populations. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 2021; 98: 104323. [DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2021.104323]
17. Hailu T, Feyissa T, Dekebo A, Hailemichael G and Gadissa F. Diversity in capsule and seed morphological and phytochemical features and essential oil composition of korarima (Aframomum corrorima (braun) PCM jansen) collections from Ethiopia. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 2021; 97: 104275. [DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2021.104275]
18. Khadivi-Khub A, Karimi E and Hadian J. Population genetic structure and trait associations in forest savory using molecular, morphological and phytochemical markers. Gene 2014; 546(2): 297-308. [DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.062]
19. Berardi AE, Hildreth SB, Helm RF, Winkel BS and Smith SD. Evolutionary correlations in flavonoid production across flowers and leaves in the Iochrominae (Solanaceae). Phytochemistry 2016; 130: 119-127. [DOI:10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.05.007]
20. Oniszczuk A, Podgórski R, Oniszczuk T, Żukiewicz-Sobczak W, Nowak R and Waksmundzka-Hajnos M. Extraction methods for the determination of phenolic compounds from Equisetum arvense L. herb. Industrial Crops and Products 2014; 61: 377-381. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.07.036]
21. Pallag A, Jurca T, Pasca B, Sirbu V, Honiges A and Costuleanu M. Analysis of phenolic compounds composition by HPLC and assessment of antioxidant capacity in Equisetum arvense L. extracts. Revista de Chimie. 2016; 67(8): 1623-1627.
22. Uslu ME, Erdoğan İ, Bayraktar O and Ateş M. Optimization of extraction conditions for active components in Equisetum arvense extract. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013; 18: 8115-8131.
23. Čanadanović‐Brunet JM, Ćetković GS, Djilas SM, Tumbas VT, Savatović SS, Mandić AI, Markov SL and Cvetković DD. Radical scavenging and antimicrobial activity of horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) extracts. International Journal of Food Science & Technol. 2009; 44(2): 269-278. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2007.01680.x]
24. Verma N and Shukla S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 2015; 2(4): 105-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.jarmap.2015.09.002]
25. Vivancos J, Deshmukh R, Grégoire C, Rémus-Borel W, Belzile F and Bélanger RR. Identification and characterization of silicon efflux transporters in horsetail (Equisetum arvense). Journal of Plant Physiol. 2016; 200: 82-89. [DOI:10.1016/j.jplph.2016.06.011]
26. Dibdiakova J, Wang L and Li H. Characterization of ashes from Pinus sylvestris forest biomass. Energy Procedia. 2015; 75: 186-191. [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.289]
27. Xu W, Lo TY and Memon SA. Microstructure and reactivity of rich husk ash. Construction and Bulding Materials 2012; 29: 541-547. [DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.005]
28. Trivedi NS, Mandavgane SA and Kulkarni BD. Mustard plant ash: a source of micronutrient and an adsorbent for removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016; 23: 20087-20099. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-016-6202-7]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Medicinal Plants

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb