year 18, Issue 71 (9-2019)
J. Med. Plants 2019, 18(71): 118-129 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nayebpour N, Asadi-Gharneh H. Variability of Fatty Acids Composition of Wild Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) Fruit. J. Med. Plants 2019; 18 (71) :118-129
URL: http://jmp.ir/article-1-2670-en.html
URL: http://jmp.ir/article-1-2670-en.html
1- Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran ,h.asadi@khuisf.ac.ir
2- Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran ,
Abstract: (3286 Views)
Background: Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) belongs to Anacardiaceae family. The dried and powdered fruits are used as a food flavoring and medicinal plant.
Objective: In this study, variability of fatty acid composition in some wild sumac fruits were investigated.
Objective: In this study, variability of fatty acid composition in some wild sumac fruits were investigated.
Method: The samples were collected from their natural origins in central parts of Iran; Isfahan and Markazi province in the September to October, 2016. The morphological characters of fresh fruits were measured. Also oil content and profile of fatty acids composition were measured.
Results: Results indicated that there are significant differences between morphological characteristics, oil percent and fatty acids compositions of wild sumac fruit populations. The range of oil percent of Iranian sumac population was 9.22% to 15.33%. The major oil quantity contained unsaturated fatty acids (64.75%- 74.08%) followed by saturated fatty acids (25.84%- 35.13%). Among saturated fatty acids, palmitic was evaluated as the highest value (21.36- 29.79 %) while the most unsaturated fatty acids were oleic acid (36.65- 44.74 %) and linoleic acid (22.62- 33.48 %). Also, soil and geographical characteristics show significant relationship with fatty acids quantity in this study.
Conclusion: According to our results concluded that the differences between fatty acids of sumac fruits may be related to the growth conditions like soil and geographical characteristics. Also, this study demonstrates that sumac can be a good source of fatty acids and could be useful for human nutrition.
Conclusion: According to our results concluded that the differences between fatty acids of sumac fruits may be related to the growth conditions like soil and geographical characteristics. Also, this study demonstrates that sumac can be a good source of fatty acids and could be useful for human nutrition.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Pharmacognosy & Pharmaceutics
Received: 2019/02/26 | Accepted: 2019/05/28 | Published: 2019/08/24
Received: 2019/02/26 | Accepted: 2019/05/28 | Published: 2019/08/24
References
1. Kossah R, Nsabimana C, Zhao J, Chen H, Tian F and et al. Comparative study on the chemical composition of Syrian sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) and Chinese sumac (Rhus typhina L.) fruits. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 2009; 8 (10): 1570-4. [DOI:10.3923/pjn.2009.1570.1574]
2. Nasar-Abbas SM and Halkman AK. Inhibition of some foodborne bacteria by alcohol extract of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.). Jounal of Food Safety 2004; 24: 257-67. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-4565.2004.00506.x]
3. Bahar B and Altug T. Flavour characterization of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) by means of GC/MS and sensory flavour profile analysis techniques. International Journal of Food Properties 2009; 12: 379-87. [DOI:10.1080/10942910701799249]
4. Morshedloo MR, Maggi F, Neko HT and Aghdam MS. Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruit. Essential Oil Variability in Iranian Populations. Industrial Crops and Products 2018; 111: 1-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.002]
5. Gharaei A, Khajeh M, Ghaffari M and Choopani A. Iranian Rhus coriaria (sumac) essential oils extraction. JEOBP. 2013; 16 (2): 270-3. [DOI:10.1080/0972060X.2013.794020]
6. Ünver A and Özcan MM. Determination of physical and chemical properties of some sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruits growing wild in Turkey. Journal of Selc. UK University Agriculture Faculty. 2006; 20 (40): 111-6.
7. Asgarpanah J and Saati S. An overview on phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Rhus coriaria. RJP. 2014; 1 (3): 47-54.
8. Kizil S and Turk M. Microelement contents and fatty acid compositions of Rhus coriaria L. and Pistacia terebinthus L. fruits spread commonly in the south eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Natural Product Research. 2010; 24 (1): 92-8. [DOI:10.1080/14786410903132555]
9. Ozcan M and Haciseferogullari HA. Condiment Sumac (Rhus corriaria L.) fruits. Somephysico-chemical properties. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 2004; 30: 74-84.
10. Ardalani H, Moghadam MH, Rahimi R, Soltani J, Mozayanimonfared A and et al. Sumac as a novel adjunctive treatment in hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Rsc Advances 2016; 6 (14): 11507-12. [DOI:10.1039/C5RA22840A]
11. Abu-Reidah IM, Ali-Shtayeh MS, Jamous RM, Arraez-Roman D and SeguraCarretero A. HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive componentsfrom Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits. Food Chem. 2015; 166: 179-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.011]
12. Matthaus B and Özcan MM. Fatty acid composition, tocopherol, and sterol contents of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruit oils. The European Journal of Lipid Science and Technol. 2015; 117: 1301-2. [DOI:10.1002/ejlt.201400547]
13. Lai J, Wang H, Wang D, Fang F, Wang F and et al. Ultrasonic extraction of antioxidants from Chinese sumac (Rhus typhina L.) fruit using response surface methodology and their characterization. Molecules 2014; 19: 9019-32. [DOI:10.3390/molecules19079019]
14. Dogan M and Akgul A. Characteristics and fatty acid compositions of Rhus coriaria cultivars from Southeast Turkey. Chemistery of Natural Compounds 2005; 41: 724-5. [DOI:10.1007/s10600-006-0021-x]
15. Ünver A and Özcan MM. Fatty acid composition of seed and pericarp of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) grown wild in different regions of Turkey. JFAE. 2010; 8 (1): 31-3.
16. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F and Malakouti MJ. Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to alleviate the stress of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biology and Biochem. 2008; 40 (5) 1197-206. [DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.014]
17. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th Edition, Arlington: 1984, USA.
18. Demchik S, Rajangam A, Hall J and Singsaas E. Fatty Acids, Carbohydrates and Total Proteins of Wild Sumac (Rhus typhina L.) Drupes from the Upper Midwest of the United States. American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products 2015; 3 (2): 30-4.
19. Wang S and Zhu F. Chemical composition and biological activity of staghorm sumac. Food Chem. 2017; 237: 431-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.111]
20. Horrocks LA and Yeo YK. Health benefits of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Pharmacological Res. 1999; 40 (3): 211-25. [DOI:10.1006/phrs.1999.0495]
21. Foran JA, Good DH, Carpenter DO, Hamilton MC, Knuyh BA and et al. Quantitative analysis of the benefits and risks of consuming farmed and wildsalmon. Nutrition 2005; 135: 2639-43. [DOI:10.1093/jn/135.11.2639]
22. Park S and Johnson MA. Awareness of fish advisories and mercury exposure in women of childbearing age. Nutrition J. 2006; 64: 250-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00207.x]
23. Wijendran V and Hayes KC. Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health. The Annual Review of Nutrition 2004; 14 (24): 597-615. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132106]
24. Fernandes L, Casal S, Cruz R, Pereira JA and Ramalhosa E. Seed oils of ten traditional Portuguese grape varieties with interesting chemical and antioxidant properties. Food Research International. 2013; 50: 161-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2012.09.039]
25. Hsieh RJ and Kinsella JE. Oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids: mechanisms, products, and inhibition with emphasis on fish. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research (Academic Press). 1989; 33: 233-341. [DOI:10.1016/S1043-4526(08)60129-1]
26. HMSO. U. K. Nutritional aspects of cardiovascular disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects No 46. London: 1994.
27. Iranmanesh Y and Jahanbazi Goujani H. Comparison of fatty acid composition of fruit oil from acorn (Persian oak), Pistacia atlantica Desf. and four wild almond species. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 2016; 33 (2): 325-37.
28. Okay Y. The Comparison of some Pistachio Cultivars Regarding their Fat, Fatty acids and Protein Content. Gartenbauwissenschaft. 2002; 67 (3): 107-113.
29. Zakerin A, Ahmadi E, Fasihi-Ramandi M, Abdollahi S and Molazadeh A. The effects of ecologic condition on antimicrobial activity of endemic herbal extracts in Fars province. Journal of Fasa University of Medical Sciences 2015; 5 (1): 111-9.
30. Mohammadi M, Asadi-Gharneh HA. How geographical differences mayaffect the uptake of nutrients by the wild populations of pennyroyal (Mentha longifolia (L.), Huds). Catena 2018; 165: 173-7 [DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.019]
31. Carvalho CC, Marques MP, Hachicho N and Heipieper HJ. Rapid adaptation of Rhodococcus erythropolis cells to salt stress by synthesizing polyunsaturated fatty acids. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnol. 2014; 98 (12): 599-606. [DOI:10.1007/s00253-014-5549-2]
32. Javanmard M, Asadi-Gharneh HA and Nikneshan P. Characterization of biochemical traits of dog rose (Rosa canina L.) populations in the central part of Iran. Natural Product Res. 2017; 32: 14, 1738-43. [DOI:10.1080/14786419.2017.1396591]
33. Mostafavi S, Asadi-Gharneh HA and Miransari M. The phytochemical variability of fatty acids in basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) affected by genotype and geographical differences. Food Chem. 2019; 276: 700-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.027]
34. Cindrić AM, Garnier C, Oursel B, Pižeta I and Omanović D. Evidencing the natural and anthropogenic processes controlling trace metals dynamic in a highly stratified estuary: The Krka River estuary (Adriatic, Croatia). Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2015; 94 (1-2): 199-216. [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.02.029]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
